BIQ Resources

BIQ Order Forms

Download BIQ 24

Download BIQ 10

Studies

Evolutionary Mismatch

Anatomy of the Foot

BIQ Foot Muscles

BIQ Knee Muscles

BIQ Pelvis Muscles

Resources

BIQ Download Center

BIQ Support Team

BIQ 24 Slideshow

Merton Root Story

Bibliography

10. Review & Conclusions

  • Over millions of years and between several species, bipedal foot characteristics have adapted to generally look and function in a specific way.
  • With the historical increase of footwear usage, there is an evident pattern of body modification
  • With the historical increase of artificial (modern) substrates, there is a clear environmental modification
  • Although human lifespans now are longer than they were in the Paleolithic era, these modifications are having an effect on humans. Obviously, it has not yet been determined to have a detriment on survival, reproductive fitness or “success” as a species altogether, but could have a specific negative affect overall health of individuals
  • Important note: switching to barefoot running or mid- or forefoot striking pattern does not guarantee a decreased risk in injury to any portion of the lower extremity it is important to describe how the foot evolved and performed before shod footwear.
  • However, shod footwear could have increased survival/reproductive fitness, whereas unshod behavior might not have at the cost of atrophying useful muscles in the leg and foot
  • We should also take into consideration lifestyle choices and anatomical difference between distant species and modern humans, i.e. height, weight, nutrition, etc.
  • A great summary of which is better: shod vs barefoot running, see kevin kirby’s youtube page


10. Review & Conclusions

  • Over millions of years and between several species, bipedal foot characteristics have adapted to generally look and function in a specific way.
  • With the historical increase of footwear usage, there is an evident pattern of body modification
  • With the historical increase of artificial (modern) substrates, there is a clear environmental modification
  • Although human lifespans now are longer than they were in the Paleolithic era, these modifications are having an effect on humans. Obviously, it has not yet been determined to have a detriment on survival, reproductive fitness or “success” as a species altogether, but could have a specific negative affect overall health of individuals
  • Important note: switching to barefoot running or mid- or forefoot striking pattern does not guarantee a decreased risk in injury to any portion of the lower extremity it is important to describe how the foot evolved and performed before shod footwear.
  • However, shod footwear could have increased survival/reproductive fitness, whereas unshod behavior might not have at the cost of atrophying useful muscles in the leg and foot
  • We should also take into consideration lifestyle choices and anatomical difference between distant species and modern humans, i.e. height, weight, nutrition, etc.
  • A great summary of which is better: shod vs barefoot running, see kevin kirby’s youtube page